Garmin Sleep Tracker: How Accurate Is It Really?

Sleep tracking devices have become increasingly popular, with many people turning to technology to gain insights into their sleep patterns and improve their overall health. While these devices can be a helpful tool for tracking sleep trends and patterns, questions have been raised about their accuracy. Garmin, a well-known brand in the world of GPS technology and wearable devices, has entered the sleep tracking market, but how accurate is their sleep tracker? This paragraph will explore the accuracy of Garmin's sleep tracking technology and compare it to other devices in the market.

Garmin sleep tracking accuracy

Sleep tracking wearables are becoming increasingly popular, but research shows that they are not 100% accurate in terms of sleep stages, total sleep time, total wake time, and sleep efficiency. While they can be helpful in tracking trends and patterns in your sleep data, which may point to underlying sleep issues, it's important to note that their accuracy varies.

Garmin, a well-known manufacturer of GPS technology and wearable technology, has also ventured into the sleep tracking space. In 2019, Garmin Health announced the development of Advanced Sleep Monitoring, an enhanced capability to more accurately identify sleep stages. This feature was the result of a sleep study conducted under the supervision of Dr. Suzanne Stevens, a certified sleep specialist. The study concluded that Garmin wearables with Advanced Sleep Monitoring could provide valuable insights into sleep hygiene and how sleep patterns impact overall health.

However, user experiences with Garmin's sleep tracking accuracy have been mixed. Some users have reported that their Garmin devices accurately tracked their sleep, reflecting sleepless nights and stress levels. On the other hand, others have found inconsistencies in the sleep data, with the device sometimes mistaking periods of wakefulness for sleep and vice versa.

Research over the past few years suggests that Garmin devices are about 78% accurate in measuring sleep versus awake time and only about 38% accurate in measuring how long it takes to fall asleep. When it comes to detecting and measuring sleep stages (deep sleep, light sleep, REM sleep), the accuracy is possibly lower, with inconsistent results across different devices and brands.

In summary, while Garmin's sleep tracking technology has improved with the introduction of Advanced Sleep Monitoring, it still may not provide perfectly accurate data for users. The accuracy of sleep tracking devices, including Garmin, is an ongoing area of research and development, with companies striving to enhance the reliability of the insights they provide to consumers.

Comparison with other sleep trackers

When compared with other sleep trackers, the accuracy of Garmin sleep trackers varies. Some users have reported that their Garmin sleep tracker often thinks they are asleep when they are awake but not moving much. For example, the Venu 3 has been said to think the user is asleep when they are lying down reading or on their phone before/after sleep. Similarly, the Fenix 7x Solar has been reviewed to give high sleep scores even on sleepless/insomnia nights.

Garmin sleep trackers have also been compared to the Oura Ring, Fitbit Charge 5, Fitbit Charge 2, and Fitbit Ionic. When comparing the sleep stages detected by the Oura Ring and the Garmin Fenix 5, one user found huge differences, concluding that the Garmin sleep metrics cannot be trusted if one is looking for accuracy. Another user compared the Instinct 2 with the Oura Ring and found that the Instinct 2 data was not close to the actual sleep metrics like deep, REM, and light sleep. However, it was probably pretty accurate with the body battery numbers. In contrast, another user found their Instinct 2 to be spot on, accurately tracking a sleepless night reflected via the stress monitor and HRV.

Comparisons have also been made between the Fitbit Charge 5 and the Venu 3, with the former being more accurate at knowing if the user was actually asleep. Similarly, the Fitbit Charge 2 and the Fitbit Ionic have been compared to the Garmin Forerunner 945, with users finding that the Fitbit options were more accurate in tracking deep sleep. However, it is important to note that the Fitbit options may be more accurate due to being considered "lifestyle watches."

In addition to these comparisons, the Garmin Vivofit 5 has been highlighted as a streamlined health-tracking option, and the Vivosmart 5 has been praised for its advanced sensors that can accurately track different stages of sleep. The Apple Watch has also been mentioned as a competitor to the Garmin sleep tracker, with the ability to track different stages of sleep and monitor motion along with data from its heart rate sensor.

Limitations of the device

While Garmin sleep trackers can be a useful tool to gain insights into your sleep patterns, they do have certain limitations that affect their accuracy and reliability.

Firstly, the accuracy of Garmin sleep trackers in measuring sleep versus wake time has been questioned. Research suggests that these devices are only about 78% accurate in distinguishing between sleep and wake states, with a tendency to overestimate sleep and underestimate wake time. This means that if you are lying down and resting or on your phone before/after sleep, your Garmin device might record this time as sleep, leading to an overestimation of your total sleep duration.

Secondly, the accuracy of Garmin devices in measuring sleep stages (deep sleep, light sleep, and REM sleep) is even lower. Research indicates that these devices are only about 38% accurate in this regard, with inconsistent results across different users. This is because the sleep stages recorded by Garmin devices are primarily based on movement and do not adequately incorporate other important physiological parameters such as heart rate variability (HRV) or heart rate (HR). As a result, your Garmin device might indicate that you were in deep sleep when you were actually awake, or vice versa.

Thirdly, the accuracy of Garmin sleep trackers might be influenced by individual factors such as race and skin tone. There is limited data on the performance of these devices across different racial and ethnic groups. However, concerns have been raised about the accuracy of the photoplethysmography (PPG)-based heart rate sensors used in Garmin devices, particularly in individuals with darker skin tones. This could potentially impact the accuracy of sleep tracking, as heart rate is one of the parameters used to estimate sleep stages.

Lastly, the accuracy of Garmin sleep trackers might be affected by external factors such as sleep environment and sleep quality. Garmin devices tend to perform worse on nights with poorer or disrupted sleep. This means that if you are tossing and turning throughout the night, your Garmin device might still indicate that you had a good night's sleep, leading to an overestimation of your sleep quality.

While Garmin sleep trackers can provide some insights into your sleep patterns, it is important to be aware of their limitations. For a more accurate assessment of your sleep, it is recommended to consult a sleep specialist or undergo a polysomnography test, which measures brain waves, heart rate, breathing, blood oxygen levels, and eye movements.

Sleep tracking features

Sleep tracking is a trend that Garmin has picked up on recently. The company has developed Advanced Sleep Monitoring, an enhanced capability to more accurately identify sleep stages. This was developed against truth data generated by a clinical device and is the result of a sleep study by Garmin Health. The study was conducted under the supervision of Dr. Suzanne Stevens, a certified sleep expert.

Garmin's sleep tracking devices measure your heart rate and motion to estimate your sleep stages. They can be helpful in paying attention to trends and patterns in your sleep data, which may point to underlying sleep issues, such as sleep apnea. However, research over the past few years suggests they are only about 78% accurate in measuring sleep versus awake time, and only about 38% accurate in measuring how long it takes you to fall asleep. Accuracy in detecting and measuring sleep stages (deep sleep, light sleep, REM sleep) is possibly even lower, with research suggesting inconsistent results.

REM (dream) sleep shows up as vivid deep pink bars on the Stages Timeline bar chart, against a background of light blue for blocks of light sleep, and dark blue for periods of deep sleep. The overall accuracy of the algorithm against this real-world data was 69.7%, with the sensitivity in detecting sleep 95.8% and the specificity in detecting being awake 73.4%. The most common misclassifications are classifying true deep sleep as light sleep and classifying true REM sleep as light sleep.

Comparing the accuracy of different sleep trackers is difficult because the gold standard of in-laboratory PSG is cumbersome for subjects and does not yield the same quality and quantity of sleep data as a subject sleeping in their own bed. However, a 2021 study published in the Nature and Science of Sleep Journal found that the Fitbit Ionic and the Oura Smart Ring possessed the lowest degrees of error in sleep tracking compared to an electroencephalography (EEG)-based device as well as other wrist-based trackers, including the Apple Watch Series 3 and Garmin Vivosmart 4.

User reviews

However, other users have reported issues with the accuracy of the Garmin sleep tracker. Some users have found that the tracker thinks they are asleep when they are just lying down and reading or on their phone. Others have found that the tracker misses deep sleep cycles and that it can take a long time to be taken out of sleep mode even when they are awake and moving around. One user noted that their tracker showed that they were awake for 1 hour and 30 minutes when it was actually only 15 minutes.

It is worth noting that the accuracy of sleep trackers can vary depending on the model and firmware updates. For example, one user reported that a firmware update for the Venu 2 improved its estimation of sleep stages. Additionally, as noted by another user, these devices use machine learning and neural networks, so the accuracy is determined by the quality of the model and the size of the training data set. Over time, as the models are trained on larger data sets, the accuracy is expected to improve.

While some users may find the Garmin sleep tracker useful, it is important to remember that these devices are not medical devices, and the accuracy may vary.

Frequently asked questions