Fitbit Sleep Tracking: How Accurate Is It Really?

Sleep tracking devices have become increasingly popular, with Fitbit being one of the most common. Fitbit's sleep tracking technology relies on motion tracking and heart rate monitoring to estimate sleep duration and quality. However, there are limitations to its accuracy, with research suggesting that it tends to overestimate total sleep time and underestimate deep sleep and REM sleep. While it can provide valuable insights into general sleep patterns, it may not accurately determine specific sleep stages. Some users have also shared their experiences, with mixed reviews regarding the accuracy of Fitbit's sleep tracking feature. Thus, the discussion surrounding the accuracy of Fitbits in tracking sleep is multifaceted, and it is essential to consider both the technological capabilities and potential limitations of these devices.

Fitbit's motion tracking and heart rate monitoring

The motion tracking feature can sometimes misinterpret data, for example, it may interpret periods of restless sleep as periods of wakefulness, or classify periods where the user is awake but not moving as sleep. Similarly, the heart rate monitor may struggle to accurately identify sleep stages due to heart rate variability. For instance, an individual's heart rate may be higher if they exercise, eat a large meal, or drink alcohol before bed.

Despite these limitations, Fitbit's motion tracking and heart rate monitoring features can provide a good estimate of an individual's general sleep patterns. According to a 2017 paper published by Fitbit scientists, the watch's sensors can classify sleep stages with 69% accuracy in any given 30-second time window. Additionally, the Fitbit Inspire 2™ was found to have a total sleep result accuracy of 76% in a study comparing its results with those of polysomnography (PSG).

While Fitbit's sleep tracking technology may not be extremely accurate, it can still provide valuable insights that users can use to improve their sleep habits. For instance, the data can help users identify patterns and make informed decisions about their sleep routines.

Limitations of the technology

While Fitbit's sleep-tracking technology may sound impressive, there are some limitations and drawbacks to the technology that can impact its accuracy and reliability.

Motion Misinterpretation

Fitbit's reliance on motion tracking can lead to inaccuracies. For example, it might interpret periods of restless sleep as periods of wakefulness, or classify periods where you are awake but not moving as sleep.

Heart Rate Variability

Your heart rate can vary wildly, even during sleep. For example, your heart rate is likely to be higher if you exercise, eat a large meal, or drink alcohol before bed. As a result, Fitbit's heart rate sensors may struggle to accurately identify sleep stages.

Subjectivity of Sleep Stages

Determining sleep stages using motion and heart rate is a simplified approach. Sleep experts often use electroencephalography (EEG) and other advanced methods to precisely categorize sleep stages. Fitbit's sleep tracking algorithm relies on motion tracking and heart rate monitoring to estimate sleep duration and quality. However, this method has limitations and may not provide a precise measurement of sleep stages.

Overestimation and Underestimation of Sleep

Fitbit sleep trackers tend to overestimate total sleep time and underestimate measures of deep sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. As deep sleep and REM sleep are considered important for recovery and memory consolidation, this means your Fitbit may give you the impression that your sleep is worse than it actually is.

User Experience and Behavioural Factors

The use of wearable sleep-tracking devices can have unintended negative consequences on user behaviour and experience. The constant monitoring of sleep data can lead to increased anxiety about sleep, causing users to become obsessed with achieving a certain amount of sleep. This can contribute to insomnia and reinforce negative sleep habits. Additionally, the device may not accurately differentiate between activities such as reading in bed and sleeping, potentially impacting the accuracy of the sleep data.

Fitbit vs. professional scientific encephalography (EEG)

Fitbit sleep trackers have become increasingly popular as a way to monitor sleep. They provide information on sleep quality and duration, allowing users to make informed decisions about their sleep habits. However, the accuracy of Fitbit sleep tracking technology has been questioned, with some key limitations that can impact its precision and reliability.

One of the limitations of Fitbit sleep tracking is its reliance on motion tracking. While Fitbit uses accelerometers to detect movement during sleep, interpreting that a user is awake based on movement can lead to inaccuracies. For example, it might classify periods of restless sleep as wakefulness or indicate that a user is asleep when they are still. Additionally, Fitbit's heart rate monitoring can be affected by factors such as exercise, large meals, or alcohol consumption before bed, impacting the accuracy of sleep stage identification.

In contrast, professional scientific encephalography (EEG) offers a more precise method of sleep stage categorization. EEG is a test that detects abnormalities in brain waves or the electrical activity of the brain. It involves placing electrodes on the scalp to detect tiny electrical charges resulting from brain cell activity. This allows for a detailed analysis of sleep stages and the detection of disorders that influence brain activity, such as Alzheimer's disease, psychoses, and narcolepsy.

Comparative studies have evaluated the effectiveness of Fitbit sleep tracking against polysomnography (PSG), a highly accurate method of measuring sleep. These studies found that Fitbit showed high sensitivity but relatively low specificity for sleep detection. While wake time after sleep onset (WASO), total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency (SE) were comparable to PSG results, Fitbit tended to overestimate TST and underestimate deep sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep.

Overall, when compared to professional scientific encephalography (EEG), Fitbit sleep tracking is reported to be around 72-73% accurate. While it may not provide the same level of precision as EEG, Fitbit can still offer valuable insights into sleep patterns and help users make informed decisions to improve their sleep habits.

Accuracy of the Fitbit Inspire 2™

The accuracy of the Fitbit Inspire 2™ has been the subject of several studies and reviews. One study compared the results of the Inspire 2 with those of polysomnography (PSG) in two repeated experiments at intervals of one week under the same conditions. The study found that the Inspire 2 variables for total sleep time (TST), deep sleep, and REM sleep were significantly overestimated. The total sleep result showed a sensitivity of 93.9%, specificity of 13.1%, and accuracy of 76.0%.

Another study found that the Fitbit Inspire 2 showed high sensitivity (0.95–0.96) and relatively low specificity (0.58–0.69) for sleep detection in a meta-analysis of the accuracy of Fitbit and PSG. Wake time after sleep onset (WASO), total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency (SE) did not differ from those of PSG, but the sleep onset latency was underestimated.

A review by PCMag found that the Inspire 2 "comprehensively" monitors sleep and has the longest battery life of any Fitbit device, lasting up to 10 days. The review also noted that the Inspire 2 is water-resistant to 164 feet, so it can be worn in the pool, although Fitbit recommends removing it when showering to avoid long-term damage.

TechGearLab also reviewed the Inspire 2, finding that it did "very well" in its health features tests, including heart rate tracking and sleep monitoring. The review noted that the Inspire 2 has an optical heart rate sensor, which was found to be "quite accurate," especially for resting heart rates.

Overall, the Fitbit Inspire 2 appears to offer good value for money as a basic fitness tracker, with accurate sleep monitoring and a long battery life. However, it may not satisfy those looking for more advanced data tracking features.

The psychological impact of using a Fitbit

The popularity of fitness trackers, such as Fitbit, has soared since its release in 2015, with one in five Americans wearing a fitness tracker daily. While Fitbits can provide insights into your daily activity levels and vital signs, there are some drawbacks and limitations to consider.

One of the potential drawbacks of using a Fitbit is the impact it can have on your mental health. The continuous use of fitness trackers can create a sense of anxiety, panic, guilt, and sadness when you are unable to meet your goals. This is especially true for individuals with addictive personalities, as the information provided by Fitbits can become the focal point of their day, potentially affecting their personal lives and relationships. Additionally, the buzz from reaching a goal on your Fitbit can trigger a dopamine release, leading to compulsive behaviours and further mental health issues. Research has also found that calorie tracking can introduce dietary limitations, causing individuals to not consume the nutrition required, which can result in various health problems and even eating disorders.

Furthermore, the accuracy of Fitbits in tracking sleep should be considered. While Fitbits can provide information about the quality and duration of your sleep, they are not highly accurate in identifying specific sleep stages. Fitbits rely on motion tracking and heart rate monitoring to estimate sleep duration and quality. However, motion misinterpretation can occur, and heart rate variability during sleep can affect the accuracy of sleep stage identification. While Fitbits can provide insights into your sleep patterns, they should not be solely relied upon for sleep tracking.

Despite the drawbacks, Fitbits and other fitness trackers have their benefits. They can provide valuable insights into your overall activity levels, sleep quality, and help identify areas for improvement. However, it is important to be mindful of the potential impact on your mental health and well-being. The information provided by Fitbits should be used as a tool to support your overall health and wellness goals, rather than becoming a source of anxiety or obsession.

In conclusion, while Fitbits can provide valuable insights into your daily activity and sleep patterns, it is important to consider the potential psychological impact of using these devices. The information and goals provided by Fitbits can trigger anxiety and other mental health issues, especially for individuals with addictive personalities. Additionally, the accuracy of sleep tracking should be considered, as Fitbits may not provide a fully accurate picture of your sleep stages. As such, it is crucial to exercise discretion and control in how you use these devices, ensuring that they support your overall wellness rather than becoming a source of negative mental health consequences.

Frequently asked questions