Police Crowd Control: Sleeping Gas, A Safe Option?

The use of tear gas by police forces on protesters has been a controversial topic in recent years, with many calling for less violent methods of crowd control. One suggestion has been for police to use sleeping gas instead of tear gas, however, this idea has several issues. Firstly, any gas that can render someone unconscious can also easily kill them with only a slightly higher dose. As such, its use in a riot situation is not advised as it could result in the deaths of innocent people. Additionally, the goal of crowd control is often to disperse a crowd, and using sleeping gas would result in people falling asleep where they stand.

The goal of police is to disperse crowds, not have them fall asleep where they stand

The goal of police in using tear gas is to disperse crowds, not to have them fall asleep where they stand. Tear gas is a chemical compound that can render people temporarily unable to function by irritating the eyes, nose, mouth, lungs, and skin. While it can cause excessive tearing, burning, blurred vision, coughing, and difficulty swallowing, among other symptoms, it is preferred by police over "sleeping gas" for crowd control.

This is because any gas that can render someone unconscious can also easily kill them in slightly higher doses. Using such gases in riot situations is not advised because of the number of otherwise innocent people who would be killed. The dose of anesthetic required differs from person to person, depending on factors like their weight, any pre-existing conditions, and other medications they may be taking. In a crowd, there would be no control over how much gas people inhale, and it is likely that there would be fatalities.

Additionally, if a crowd of people were to fall asleep where they stand, they would need to be arrested and medically treated, which would require a lot of manpower and resources. In contrast, tear gas makes people disperse under their own power.

It is hard to administer an accurate dosage of sleeping gas to a random crowd

There are several reasons why police don't shoot sleeping gas into crowds, and one of the most significant is the challenge of administering an accurate dosage to a random group of people. The dosage of sleeping gas or anaesthetic required to render someone unconscious varies significantly from person to person and is influenced by factors such as individual physiology, pre-existing health conditions, and other medications they may be taking. In a medical setting, anaesthesiologists undergo extensive training and have detailed knowledge of a patient's medical history to ensure the correct dosage is administered.

In a crowd setting, it is impossible to account for these variables and control the dosage each person inhales. Some individuals might inhale a dose that is too low to be effective, while others might receive a dose that is dangerously high, potentially leading to serious health complications or even death. The effects of sleeping gas can be unpredictable, and what may cause mild drowsiness in one person could cause another to stop breathing entirely.

Additionally, the wind and open-air environment can make it difficult to control the dispersion of the gas, leading to unpredictable exposure levels. The goal of crowd control is typically to disperse the crowd, and having a large group of people fall asleep in place could create a hazardous situation, with individuals falling and injuring themselves. It would also place a significant burden on law enforcement and emergency medical services to safely manage and monitor a large number of unconscious individuals until they awaken.

The challenge of accurately dosing a crowd with sleeping gas, without causing unintended harm, highlights why such measures are not routinely used by law enforcement. The potential risks and logistical challenges far outweigh the benefits, and alternative methods such as tear gas or pepper spray are often seen as more effective and controllable tools for crowd dispersal, despite their own controversies and potential health risks.

Police don't have the resources to arrest or look after a large group of unconscious people

Police officers do not shoot sleeping gas into crowds because they do not have the resources to arrest or look after a large group of unconscious people. If a sleeping gas was used, the police would need to arrest and detain the entire crowd, which would be a huge undertaking. The police would also need to ensure that each person affected by the gas was receiving the correct medical attention, which would be difficult to do for a large group of people.

Additionally, the use of sleeping gas could result in people injuring themselves as they fall unconscious. This could lead to further complications and legal issues for the police. The goal of crowd control is often to disperse the crowd, not to have them collapse and require medical care.

Furthermore, there is no safe sleeping gas that can be effectively administered to a large group of people. Any gas that has the ability to render someone unconscious can also easily kill them if the dosage is slightly too high. As such, the use of sleeping gas in a riot situation is not advised due to the risk of innocent people being killed.

The dose of anaesthetic required to induce sleep varies from person to person and is influenced by factors such as pre-existing health conditions, other medications being taken, and individual circumstances. Without this knowledge, the police would have no way of ensuring that the gas they are administering is safe for everyone in the crowd.

In summary, the use of sleeping gas by police officers is not practical due to the lack of resources to arrest and care for a large group of unconscious people, the risk of injury, and the danger of administering anaesthetic without proper knowledge of individual health factors.

There is no such thing as a safe sleeping gas

Additionally, the use of sleeping gas could result in people injuring themselves as they fall unconscious. This could be particularly dangerous in a crowded area, as people may fall on top of one another or be trampled, leading to further injuries. Furthermore, once the crowd is asleep, law enforcement would need to have the manpower and resources to safely move and care for the unconscious individuals until they wake up, which could be a challenging and time-consuming task.

Another critical consideration is the danger of overdose. All known tranquilizers and anaesthetics can be deadly if administered in incorrect dosages, and the correct dosage varies significantly from person to person. Factors such as pre-existing health conditions, medication usage, and individual biochemistry can greatly affect how a person responds to sleeping gas. Without knowing the medical history and current health status of each person in the crowd, law enforcement officers would be risking the lives of many innocent people by using sleeping gas.

The potential consequences of using sleeping gas were tragically demonstrated during the Moscow theatre siege in 2002. In this incident, Russian authorities used a fentanyl derivative to incapacitate Chechen terrorists holding hostages in a theatre. While the gas successfully disabled the terrorists, it also resulted in the deaths of approximately 15% of the 800 people exposed, due to respiratory depression and muscular rigidity.

In conclusion, while the concept of using sleeping gas to calm hostile crowds may seem appealing, the risks far outweigh the benefits. The unpredictable and potentially deadly effects of such gases mean that there is no safe option for use in these situations.

The use of tear gas to disperse crowds has come under criticism, with some calling for it to be banned

The use of tear gas as a crowd control measure has come under criticism, with some calling for its ban. While law enforcement agencies defend its use as an effective tool for dispersing crowds, there are concerns about its impact on human health and the environment.

Tear gas is a broad class of gas incapacitants known as riot-control agents (RCAs) that cause pain, difficulty breathing, and temporary blindness. While considered non-lethal, there have been instances of tear-gas-related deaths and serious injuries. The use of tear gas during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, for example, led to a wave of criticism and lawsuits. In one instance, police in Charlotte, North Carolina, used tear gas on a crowd of peaceful protesters, causing coughing, wheezing, and burning sensations.

Medical professionals have raised concerns about the safety of tear gas, especially when used in confined spaces, in excessive quantities, or when fired directly at individuals. There is limited research on the health effects of tear gas, and much of the existing data focuses on healthy, young military personnel rather than the general public. Some studies have linked tear gas exposure to physical and psychological health issues, including respiratory illnesses, eye and skin irritation, gastrointestinal issues, and mental health problems such as anxiety and depression.

Critics argue that tear gas constitutes a chemical weapon and that its use by law enforcement against civilians is unethical and inhumane. They point to the fact that tear gas is banned in warfare by the Chemical Weapons Convention but allowed for law enforcement, creating a double standard. There is also concern about the lack of government oversight of the manufacture and use of tear gas, with the industry left to regulate itself.

As a result of these concerns, there have been calls for a moratorium on the use of tear gas by law enforcement and for more stringent regulations or even a complete ban on its use. Some US lawmakers have introduced bills to restrict or ban the use of tear gas by police, and the American Thoracic Society has called for a moratorium, citing a lack of research, the escalation of tear gas use, and potential risks to lung health and the spread of COVID-19.

Frequently asked questions